BUILT FOR REDDIT · GAMES WITH A HOOK

REDACTED

Not trivia — closed-world deduction. Zero AI, handcrafted linted cases. A daily murder-mystery case file where every reader gets a different partial shard — nobody can solve it alone. The crowd has to pool clues in the comments to file a verdict.

BUILT FOR REDDIT - GAMES WITH A HOOK REDACTED REDACTED A daily mystery no single reader can solve alone. Every player's dossier is censored differently The comment thread IS the evidence board Contradictions flagged in red string Hourly shard drip - cases always close Verdict ceremony crowns early accusers 14 LAUNCH CASES - SOLVABILITY-LINTED Devvit Web React Redis Tx Triggers Scheduler CASE #17 - DAY 3 EYES ONLY the pawn ticket was dated the 14th - AFTER the fire YOUR SHARD CONTRADICTS CASE UNREDACTED 61% to 63% FILE MY EVIDENCE - posts as your comment r/the_redacted_game_dev - License: MIT
The Hook

Your dossier is censored differently from everyone else's

A deterministic deal hands each reader a few unredacted lines out of ~40 clue shards the rest of the crowd doesn't have yet. The case cannot be solved by any single person — the comment thread becomes the evidence board where the subreddit collectively un-redacts the truth.

CASE #17 · DAY 3 EYES ONLY
CASE UNREDACTED
Why It's Different

Four things no other daily puzzle does

Every claim below is a structural property of the architecture — not a theme painted on top.

Asymmetric information

Every reader is dealt a different partial shard of the same case file. No single person — including a judge who just arrived — ever holds the whole truth.

Zero AI, handcrafted cases

All launch cases are hand-authored and pass an offline solvability linter — a Monte-Carlo of 1,000 random deals, every time, all reaching the truth.

Closed-world deduction, not trivia

Everything you need is inside the case file. No outside knowledge helps and no outside knowledge hurts — it's a logic puzzle, not a quiz.

The crowd must pool clues

Filing your shard as a comment lights contradictions in red string across the board. The subreddit has to read each other's evidence to file a verdict.

How It Works

Receive → read the board → file → accuse

One tap posts your evidence card as a real comment under your username. The case meter ticks up; the suspect bars shift in real time.

1

Receive your shard

Open the case folder. One black bar is yours — tap it and the redaction peels off to reveal your line of the case file.

2

Read the board

Browse evidence cards other players have filed. Contradiction pairs glow red where both sides are already on the board.

3

File your evidence

One tap posts your line as a typeset evidence card — a real comment, under your username. The case meter ticks up.

4

Accuse

Stake your read on one suspect. At the scheduled hour, the verdict ceremony crowns the earliest correct accusers.

"A judge who opens the post isn't evaluating a game — within 30 seconds they're personally holding a line 400 strangers need."
— the whole pitch, in one sentence
Field notes

The precinct talks in the comments

Every filed shard is a line in the case. These are the kinds of notes the board produces — the voice of the investigation, in the detectives' words.

My shard was a pawn-ticket dated the 14th — two days after the fire. Filed it, and the watchman the whole board was sure about got struck off. Chills.

DS
u/desk_sergeant
Case #17 · first correct accuser

I had one line nobody else could see. Turns out it was the contradiction that lit the whole red string. You genuinely need every reader in the room.

NW
u/night_ward
filed the pivotal shard

Read the dossier, thought I had it, then the comments flipped everything. We closed the case as a crowd at hour 19. Best thread I've read on Reddit in months.

AR
u/archivist_r
Case #18 · verdict crowd

In-world flavor from the game's demo cases — REDACTED has no external users yet; nothing here is presented as a real customer review.

Questions

Before you open the case file

How do I play? +
Open the case post on r/the_redacted_game_dev. Your dossier is censored differently from everyone else's — peel your one visible line, file it as an evidence card, and watch it strike suspects or light a contradiction. Pool clues in the comments, then accuse before the verdict hour.
Why can't I solve it alone? +
By design. Every reader gets a different partial shard of the same case, so no single dossier contains enough to convict — the crowd has to combine its lines, which makes every new reader structurally valuable.
Is it AI-generated? +
No — zero runtime AI. Every case is handcrafted and passed through a solvability linter (a 1,000-trial Monte-Carlo using the same deduction engine as the game) so it's guaranteed solvable but never trivial.
Is it free? +
Yes. It runs natively inside a Reddit post via Devvit — no install, no account beyond your Reddit login, no payments.
What's it built on? +
Devvit Web: a React webview, a Hono server over Redis, an offline case compiler, and Reddit realtime. No external services and an empty fetch allowlist.
Is the code open? +
Yes — full source on GitHub under MIT, with CI, 100% coverage on the shared/core/routes gate, and 269 passing tests.

Open the post. Peel your line.
The precinct needs you.

One tap on the live demo post is the pitch — no install, no account required.